Part Two:
Results & Conclusions
“Here we touch upon the greatest riddle of life: the function of self-perception and self-awareness” Reich, Selected Writings, pp519.
A. SYNOPSIS
In Part one of this paper the background to the orgone consciousness study was discussed. Namely, Reich’s views on consciousness in his middle and latter periods, the repeat of the oranur experiment by Southgate in 2017 and the building of a philosophical framework regarding orgone and consciousness.
The paper examined the rationale and methods involved in the study. It also looked at the problems of using a technological approach to examine consciousness outside of organisms. A rationale was given that only direct experiential evidence suffices to examine whether non-organism entities (like an energy field) possess consciousness. The methods were also based on the idea of synchronicity increasing due to consciousness (based on the organisational aspects of consciousness).
In the experimental sessions a participant asks a question of the energy field, numbers are evinced mechanically (from the field) and then the person spends the night in the energy and dreams are recorded.
The object of the study is to examine if there were unusual or increased synchronicity occurring between the above parameters. Two aspects were considered possible evidence: direct communication within the dream state and increases in synchronicity demonstrated by the numbers and their correlations. Synchronicity, or anomalous organisation, may be an effect of the increase in quantity, and activity of conscious energy.
This second part of this paper outlines the results of the study and makes some conclusions.
Its main conclusion was that the participant questions were answered and that increased synchronicity did take place. This is proposed as possible evidence of consciousness in an energy.
B. RESULTS
A full account of each participant’s session is available (1). For this report a condensed version is given outlining the key correlations.
Run 1, Summer 2025.
Participant #1
• 56-year-old male working in healthcare.
• Normally dreams moderately with average recall.
• Dream lucidity and recall was significantly greater. Effects continued afterward.
• Question: about romance.
• Specific dream answers to his question, highlighting both a cause, effects and solutions.
• Key number correlation – 64.
• Key dream scene: an anchor which tied to a scene in the movie, ’Yellow Submarine’ which in turn tied to the song, ‘When I’m 64’.
• Many ties between 64 (and its factor, 8) to the dreams, question, movie and song.
• The unexplained oranur sound (termed the rumble by the researcher) occurred just before the session.
• Energy field seemed to prompt him to awaken and record information during the night.
Synchronicity in Real life:
• Before one of the later sessions the dream scene with the anchor appeared to be re-enacted in the researcher’s life in a large coastal search and rescue operation he witnessed at close hand.
Participant #2
• 21-year-old female student and data analyst.
• Normally dreams quite intensely, fair recall.
• Dreaming style changed. Lucidity was baseline, quantity and recall greater.
• Question: about her new university course.
• Oranur rumble occurred during the participant’s arrival.
• Multiple pre-cognitive numbers and words from participant.
• Key number correlations, 1,7.
• Experimental numbers were statistically mostly the less significant median of 1 but their significance increased for other reasons: the exact and multiple pre-cognition and that another participant, #5, also had a similar sequence of the median number. It also linked to the correlation principle of Run 2 (triple digit repeat numbers: more later).
• Energy felt like it prompted her to awaken and write the dreams down.
• Participant felt nervous of the session.
• Dreams (and numbers) specifically answered her question: follow her ‘singular path’.
• Dreams spoke of the key things holding her back.
• Joke in the dreams about a rat and the feeling of not being nourished.
Synchronicity in Real Life:
• Experimental and precognitive number, 117, ‘leaked out’ in bizarre ways, firstly in an accident regarding water and a mobile phone. The phone later unexpectedly recovered but the researcher now had two smartphones. It turned out to be essential for the experiment to have two devices (to evidence the existence of the oranur sound, the rumble).
• An overheard, loud and improbable conversation from a supermarket worker featuring 117 (same worker was to ‘take part’ again in Run 2).
• The ‘dream rat’ appeared for real. A huge dead rat turned up outside a local school. The researcher had to remove it.
Participant #3
• Mid-70s, male, ex-head-gardener, artistic.
• Dreams a lot, good recall, regular bad dreams.
• Mildly increased dream recall, vivid dreams just before awakening.
• Precognitive number during meditation. Number referenced his conversation with the energy and his key experimental number – 3 or 33.
• Question: about health, wealth and peace. Dreams and numbers appeared to be answering a deeper narrative regarding fear of death, worries about being looked after, and having power over his life. Also, the repayment of ‘debts.’
• Had felt anxious about the session.
• Most of the night spent in a healing phase due to tiredness.
• No prior oranur rumble sound.
• Key experimental number reflected in the dreams – 33. There were two key scenes both having a central component of three people, so 3 and 3 or 33. The 33 also had multiple references both to the participant’s question and to his life.
Participant #4
• 65-year-old male, social activist, ex-Royal Navy, served in Falklands war.
• Normally dreams little with minimal recall.
• Dreaming pattern reversed. Dreamt continually with excellent recall, waking up at regular intervals to record his impressions.
• Question: about bringing joy and positivity to the world and about being true to himself.
• Had the largest outlier in the Run 1 numbers with a three-digit number – 104. This was also his key correlation number.
• Snapshot dreams involving a photo of himself (self-reflection) and a dream of a song (reminiscent of orgone), A dream offering advice about activism and one about the positivity of social engagement. Lastly, about plasma/energy and AI (a current interest).
• Oranur energy in the premises seemed very strong the night of the session.
• The outlier number, 104, had multiple references, it signified crowds, which were prominent in many of the dreams but also the Liver Building, war and empire. Power struggles were referenced by the other numbers.
• The participant was himself an ‘outlier’ due to his normal dreaming patterns.
• Rumble sound before session.
Synchronicity in Real Life:
• The researcher sleeping upstairs nearly had an OBE (Out of Body Experience) brought on by a reverberating sound like that which occurred in the oranur experiment of Southgate in 2017 (2).
Participant #5
• 43-year-old male, vegetable gardener and carer.
• Dreams vividly in long sequences nightly, good recall.
• Short, impactful key scenes, mostly involving the playing of games (two of which correlated with his key experimental number, 8). There was one non-game scene, about waiting, in which he perhaps felt, ‘snookered’. (This refers to being unable to move or in a difficult position generally, taken from the game of snooker). The participant was waiting for a big leg operation for himself and a major operation for his mother, scheduled for the same time.
• Question: about a mission to activate energy sites around the world and about a partner.
• His numbers had 3 instances of the mode and a 5 but these numbers were highly significant symbolically as they tied into the dream games and Participant #2’s similar numbers. Also, the sum of his numbers tied directly to a key number of Run 1 – 8. He additionally had a connection to Run 2 via 3-digit repeat numbers.
• The 8 also signifies astrological aspects – the symbol for eternity being an 8 on its side – ∞. It also factors 4 twice which can be a reference to the earth (4 compass directions). Therefore, ‘astrological functions upon the earth’ and ‘couple’.
Synchronicity in Real life:
• Not long after the session participant had a mild OBE.
Run 2, Winter 2025
Participant #6
• 56-year-old male (also Participant #1).
• Hard getting to sleep, excess of energy was felt.
• Normally average dream lucidity and recall.
• Dream lucidity, quantity and recall higher than session 1, much higher than baseline.
• Question: chronological past-life overview.
• 8 dreams and 2 hypnagogic episodes: 10 episodes in total. 8 dreams clearly recalled, 2 dreams having partial recall. (Hypnagogic episodes are halfway between being awake and dreaming, the person is not fully unconscious).
• Extensive overview of possible past lives via a hypnagogic episode and dreams. Connections to England, Germany and Asia through the British Empire. Past lives apparently mainly ET, then animal, then earth human, in that order.
• The key number was 8 which is the numerology of the sum of the experimental numbers (26 or 2 + 6 = 8).
• Key number correlated to the dreams via the number of dreams – 8.
• 8 was also a key number theme from Run 1.
• Correlation to the number of hypnagogic episodes from the first digit of the sum – 2 of 26.
• Key number via the sum connected to the first session for this participant where the key number was also the sum – 64.
• Twenty-Six is also 62 mirrored, indicating 2nd as 62 is 2 less than 64.
• ‘Double cosmological cycles’, 12 x 2, (12 meaning cosmos) implied via the sum of the second and fourth experimental numbers – 24. The first and second numbers also created a power number or 1,1.
Participant #7
• 23-year-old language teacher. National level athlete in her teens. Learning Vedic astrology (traditional Indian astrology). Moving to southern Europe shortly.
• Normally dreams most nights with clear dreams and good recall 2/3 times a week.
• Dream recall/clarity possibly slightly improved compared to her nightly average.
• Took her a while to get to sleep, her day had been busy. Felt a pressure band around her head shortly before retiring, which dissipated – possibly an effect from oranur.
• Vivid dream with good recall.
• Question: about her move abroad.
• Has a strong energy field: her experimental numbers were correspondingly high, in the low hundreds.
• Key correlating number – 2. It appeared 3 times as digits within the other experimental numbers.
• Many 2’s in her dream, mostly through use of duality, 4 instances.
• Experimental numbers focused on 2 via its appearance as a digit three times in the initial numbers and via factorisation – there was 2 experimental numbers which had 2 factors only (one was a prime thus having only 2 factors overall, 127, and one had 4 factors, 226, but only two prime factors). One of her experimental numbers contained a double 2, 226. The sum ended in 2.
• The sum, 712, also reflected that she was the 7th participant with an interest in astrology – 12.
• After the dreaming it was found out that she had a strong personal ‘angel’ number of 2, 2, 2.
• There were some 12 instances of her angel number 2 associated with the session altogether, again reflecting the sum (7, 12).
• Her numbers, via numerology, reflected her friend’s numbers (Participant #2) of 1, 1, 7, 1. Participant #7’s numbers in Run 2 reduced in numerology to 7, 1, 1, 1, a number anagram of 1, 1, 7, 1. Participant #7’s sum also reflects a key number from Run 1 – 17, the 71(2) mirrored.
• The session finished on the 22nd of the 11th, another occurrence of her angel number (2, 2, and 2 – the 11th as 1 + 1 = 2).
• No prior rumble.
Synchronicity in Real Life:
• The oranur device started rumbling at 2.22pm the day after the session.
• Researcher had two supermarket-based, unlikely coincidences involving multiple 2’s.
• Double prolonged sighting of a large and rare bird (in an urban area) by the researcher, a British Buzzard (which perhaps signifies the ‘taking flight’ of the participant). The Buteo Buteo or common British Buzzard is a large bird of prey, usually brown in colour with a wingspan of about 1.25 metres. It is usually seen in countryside locations. It has recovered well from being endangered in the early 1900s. It has wide wings, a gliding motion in flight and feeds on small animals and insects. It is very unusual for such a bird to be seen in an urban area.
• Humorous occurrence with a dog breed and name (also indicating a very unlikely 2 but separated in time by some 43 years).
• A clock appeared to the participant in real life during the session displaying her angel number (2, 2, 2) instead of the actual time (8am).
Participant #8
• 21-year-old female (also participant #2).
• Normally, vivid dreaming, fair recall.
• Dream lucidity and recall significantly raised from 1st session and from normal.
• Question: where is her soul from?
• Was anxious about the session.
• Before and afterwards: hyper-lucid dreams occurred connected to the session.
• Highest experimental number was 177, reflecting her key number in 1st session (117 or 17).
• New phenomenon: One of the dreams was a hybrid of an OBE and a dream.
• The question answered by a strange, violent scene within the OBE/dream. Decoded it stated that she was ‘from’ a divine source and had been ‘spoken’ into existence.
• There was one occurrence of angel number, 1, 1, 1 within the dream encoded as a time on her phone (the phone appeared as an OBE/dream entity in the dream). The number also appeared in a hypnagogic episode between dreams as a voice recounting a time.
• Although the participant mainly asked about the origin of her soul, she was also given an extensive past life overview within 7 dreams.
• Key correlating number, like Run 1, was 7, but here correlated by 7 dreams.
• The past life overview concerned lives as a warrior as well as non-human lives, possibly in other dimensions, and problems encountered in multiple past existences. Dreams also reflected that she had known her partner and current family before.
Synchronicity in Real Life:
• Oranur device appeared to precognitively predict both the session number and some contents. Three days before the session the oranur rumble sound occurred but the main band of sound changed pitch from 32 Hz to 35 Hz, 3 + 5 = 8 for the 8th session. This is the only time the main band has changed pitch.
• The oranur rumble sound, on the day of the session, predicted a key number from the dreams, 3, through the unusually short length of the rumble (3 minutes). It also referenced the prior key number of ‘17’ via the clock time it occurred and finished.
• Sighting of possible plasma orbs and strange drone by the participant before the session of her friend, Participant #7.
Follow-up support required and ongoing.
Participant #9
• Energetic female in mid-70s with 3 adult children that she raised alone. Loves dancing and music. She is thinking about moving to Asia.
• Normally vivid dreaming, excellent recall.
• Instead had key, lucid scenes.
• Question: about a move abroad.
• Like Participants #6 and #8 felt prompted to awaken between each dream.
• Series of dream flashes with 7 key scenes. Key correlation number – 7.
• She also had an OBE/dream hybrid. In one dream she watched a fly crawling along the actual bed covering she was sleeping under.
• Dreams answered her question.
• Aural dream of a current pop song, the lyrics of which reference her question in multiple ways.
• Angel number of 1, 1, 1 appeared twice within the experimental numbers (6 x the 1 digit).
Synchronicity in Real Life:
• Day of the session oranur rumble sound started up at 5.40pm, 3 bands of sounds instead of 1, the main one at its usual 32 Hz but also a new secondary one at 64 and 100 Hz, so a 3. The rumble occurred at 5.40pm which is 5 + 4 + 0 = 9, mirroring the 9th participant. Since this time the tri-band appearance of the rumble has continued.
• Had precognitive numbers. Her ‘lucky’ numbers sum to 17, 7 being her key correlation number and 17 being a key correlation for the experiment overall, especially Run 1. Her second experimental number was 1710.
• Buzzard was seen again, like participant #7 who was just about to move abroad – to ‘take flight’, Participant #9 also had connections to the same buzzard (and is considering a move abroad). The researcher saw the buzzard 3 days before and 3 days after session #9.
• Researcher experienced an anomaly involving the time of 3.11am and a freezer being mysteriously unplugged shortly after the session. He narrowly avoiding the spoiling of an expensive Christmas item – a goose, a bird known for migrations.
• After the session when the researcher was visiting to do an acupuncture treatment. There was a black Hackney cab in her carpark with the rare registration plate of 111. (A Hackney cab is the traditional black taxi often associated with London, though they are also used in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Manchester).
Participant #10
• Busy grandmother with 3 grown-up children. Recently active Christian.
• Normally dreams nightly but with little recall. There is one or two vivid dreams a month with recall.
• Question: what is her true path for herself and family and what it is that is guiding her.
• Quite tired on arrival.
• Had been a little anxious regarding the session.
• Slept unusually well by the oranur device.
• Vivid vision during evening by oranur device – in motion and colour. Does not normally have visions. She saw a telescope or tunnel through which she could see a pink night sky with lots of stars and a pink/purple egg-shaped object travelling through the cosmos. It was around the time of 3iAtlas’s perihelion.
• Prior to session #10 the researcher’s dreaming changed. This continued for a week afterwards. There was a dream about a trauma connected to the researcher’s father and his passing during covid era. Also, there was a vivid dream about orgonomy’s recognition in the future (likely at least 50 years from now). Also, further dreams about his father set in a dramatically changed, future London. Dreams had an intense ‘oranur’ quality despite not being directly next to the device.
• Participant dreamt during the session but without recall. It appears the main dream was had on her behalf by the researcher.
• The numbers took a while to elucidate. A manual stop had to be added as there was no zero point (as per additional rule 1). Thereafter her numbers were straightforward.
• She could feel the oranur device’s energy via a sensation of touch. Also, when her thoughts increased, the audible clicks from the wheel count (during number collection) seemed to increase in unison, she reported.
• The key correlation number was 50, third of her four experimental numbers. Five represents the original number in her immediate family and zero is symbolic of family losses experienced (first brother’s passing, her husband in divorce).
• First experimental number may have answered latter part of her question, ‘who is guiding me?’ In numerology, 89 reduces to 17 (commonly meaning the divine) and then to 8 (the oranur device code).
• Her vision answered the 1st part of her question: she should use her acute vision to explore the cosmos. An underlying aspect of the question (regarding her family) was then answered by the researcher’s dream on her behalf.
• Session #10 presaged further research. The experimenter is wondering what would happen if more than 1 person was sleeping in the oranur. Would a shared experience develop, as in Charles Tart’s mutual hypnosis? (3).
• She has a personal angel number of 4, often appearing as 444 or 1414. This connected her to participants #6, #7, #8 and #9 who also had angel numbers appear in Run 2. The number 14 connects her to participants #1, #3 and #4 via Liverpool, the Ark of the Covenant and the Liver building symbology (all 4’s and 14’s). It also connects her to the Biblical aspects of her being a committed Christian recently (144 being a key Biblical number). The 4 was hidden within the numerology of her experimental numbers.
• She was the only participant with two prime numbers in her data. Many of the other prime numbers in the study seemed to also relate to her, representing various aspects of her immediate family.
• On the night of the session the researcher had a vivid dream with the same enhanced feel as the oranur dreams. It was of the researcher going up a lift in a residential tower block with 4 or 5 other people. It was black and white (representing the past). There was an older gent carrying a baby (the lift may represent passing upwards into a new environment). The researcher knew immediately it was significant.
• The next day it was discovered that the researcher’s dream may have been related to a key family event of the participant. The older man in his dream may have been her father. In the late 1950s her mother was pregnant with her first son. The son was born stillborn at full term. Traumatically, the hospital made no provision. Her mother was put into a post-labour ward full of newborns. Her father was sent home with the baby’s body in a box.
Synchronicity in Real Life:
• The morning following the overnight session the researcher was walking in the memorial gardens. He saw the same buzzard but perched on the only tree in the gardens to be in early spring-time blossom (late December, early Cherry Blossom). Unusually, the buzzard was perched low, about 9 foot off the ground. It did not fly away. The researcher had shortly before this point asked for a sign that he had interpreted his dream correctly.
• The oranur was strong overnight waking the researcher up at 4.50am with a sun-tan feeling (indicating high oranur) and a high pitch sound (not the oranur rumble, also indicating high oranur). Four is her personal angel number and 50 was her key experimental correlation number.
• The next day, the researcher, working in nearby Liverpool, saw the rare Hackney taxi-cab plate, ‘3’.
C. CONCLUSIONS
First Run Conclusion
Run 1 was conducted in summer, 2025. The average age was 51, ranging from 21 to 74. There were 4 male participants and 1 female. Younger, female, active participants would be the most sensitive to orgone according to Southgate’s early study (4).
Participants #2, #3 and #5 normally dream quite vividly, Participant #1 is medium, and Participant #4 does not dream much. All 5 participants had different dreaming during the sessions, especially #4. This wasn’t a simple heightening however, some dreamed more, some less. This indicates there could be an intentional process because the dreams appeared to be adjusted to enable better recall. Those who dreamt profusely, dreamt less, but in key scenes. Those who dreamt medium, had heightened lucidity and recall, whilst one person who hardly dreams, dreamt continually.
There was a correlation between the oranur device making the rumbling sound and the commencement of the sessions, 4 out of 5 sessions were preceded by the rumble. This is unusual. The rumble occurs intermittently as little as once a month. Two of the sessions which had a preceding rumble took place on consecutive nights. The rumble has been absent for some time after the experimental runs, especially Run 2. There is no known control over it.
All 5 numerical datasets were meaningful in answering the participant’s questions.
All 5 datasets had multiple number correlations between the numbers and the actual dream content. For example, Participant #1 had a dream about an anchor and two figures nearby. The numbers correlated with the song ‘When I’m 64’ which is in the movie ‘Yellow Submarine’. This movie has an underwater scene featuring an anchor and two figures, one of whom is setting out to rescue people, just as in the dream. The song scene in the movie prominently references Participant #3’s key number too, 33. He is connected to the movie in real life and knows Participant #1. The anchor scene also bizarrely ‘leaked’ into real life for the researcher.
Participant #2’s connection was through the number 7. There was 7 characters in her dreams. Also, the 1s in her data indicated following her ‘singular’ path, 7 indicates completeness.
Participant #3’s connection was through the number 33. There were 2 sets of 3 characters in his dream, one in life, one in death. The participant had multiple problems with broken bones, 33 represents bones as well (via the spinal column). Thirty-three connects to birds and to Liverpool (Liver Birds) through the phoenix symbol of the 33rd degree of masonry. He is a keen bird-keeper raised in Liverpool.
Participant #4’s connection was through the aspect of ’many’ and Navy associations of the number 104 (minus the zero so fourteen for the Liver Building which looks out onto the sea. The building has 14 partial globes on its roof. Digits 1 plus 4, thus 5 signifying the Pentagon, therefore ‘military’, 1 + 0 + 4 = 5).
Participant #5’s association was through the word ‘game’ and through the game of pool represented by the number 8 (which associates with pool) and by the dream snooker cue.
Overall, the numbers are evenly distributed though with a preponderance of ones. There are eleven ‘1’s, the median number. There are nine numbers, or nearly 50% of the dataset that are of greater significance. There are six numbers that are of medium to high significance, (between 10 and 100) and one number over 100, the greatest outlier (Participant #4) and the most significant single number in Run 1. He was literally an ‘outlier’ as he doesn’t normally dream. This was something not known by the researcher beforehand.
Participant #1’s data had the most significant numbers and departure from the median followed by Participant #3. Participants #2 and #5 both had a dominance of the median but their dreams either reflected the key number, 7, or the sum of their numbers, 8 respectively. Both had the mode number three times. There was a connection through the symbolism of the snooker game too (through their age difference and the number of balls in snooker – 22). Triple repeat numbers also tie both in with Run 2. Both participants had an actual connection to Run 2.
Participant #4’s dataset had a sum of 117, a key number for Participant #2 and which kept turning up in real life as well as the 117 or 17 (with the strange synchronicities described).
The entire dataset in Run 1 sums to 255. This number factors by 17, a key number overall, especially in participant #2’s data. Also 17 in numerology turns to 8, the key number for oranur. The number 255 divides by 17 exactly 15 times. The number 15 was the first number in the Run 1 dataset. If one takes the sum of the entire Run 1 dataset as the last number, we have the alpha and omega, a reflection. The two last numbers of the Run 1 dataset, 1 and 5 reflect the first number, 15, another mirror. Five also reflects the 5 participants in 1 experiment, 15. Fifteen also mirrors 51. Oranur was of course discovered in ’51 (1951).
Lastly, the dream content in all 5 sets of dreams answered the question posed by the participants. This is itself a departure from semi-random dreaming. One wouldn’t expect 5 sets of significant dreaming in a row especially in a new environment. All 5 people dreamt and had good recall. Some felt that they were prompted to awake and record their dreams (particularly #1 and #2).
Patterns and references between the individual data also counters coincidence. For example, Participant’s #1 and #3 had a mirror through the number 56 (a sum for Participant #3 and Participant #1’s age). Participant’s #2 and #4’s mirrored through 117. Participants #2 and #5, the youngest participants in Run 1, had two mirrors (three times the median of 1 and the number 22 – representing snooker but also their age difference). Participants #1 and #5 had a mirror through the number 8 and the concept of ‘game’ (chess and pool respectively).
ChatGPT’s analysis noted that Participant #1, #3 and #5’s numbers all encoded the number 8. Participant #1’s numbers factor into 8, as do #3’s. Participant #5’s numbers summed to 8. This was seen as significant by ChatGPT, possibly a deliberate clue left within the data. Participant #1’s data was felt to be the most informative set overall by the AI. It was also noted that Participant #4’s data had the most significant single number as a likely deliberate extreme outlier – 104. All analysis has been by a human apart from that labelled as from AI.
The encoding of the 8 is like a ‘signature’ as 8 is a possible code number for oranur.
No suggestion had been given to elicit the precognitive numbers (Participant #2 and #3).
The number to dream correlation was often based on the number of people in the dream. Participants #2, #3 and #4 had correlations via this method. Participant #5’s correlation was via a concept (games). Participant #1 was via an object connected to a song and movie. The main correlation method changed in Run 2.
Lastly, all 5 participants in Run 1 had at least three 1’s appearing within their experimental numbers. This connects them to the triple digit repeat principle of Run 2, more later.
Tables 1 and 2 summarises the data obtained from the Run 1 participants.
| Participant: | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dream Sync Number |
64* | 1, 7 | 33 | 104 | 8* |
| Key Dream Correlate Symbol |
Anchor | Singular Path, Seven People |
Three People in Life. Three in Death | Crowds | Snooker Cue |
| Question answered | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Precognitive Number | No | 117 17 |
48 | No | No |
| Prior Rumble | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Change in Dreaming | Yes, Increased Quantity & Recall |
Yes, Increased Quantity |
Yes, Decreased Quantity, Increased Clarity/Recall |
Yes++ Increase, All Aspects |
Yes, Decreased Quantity. |
| Correlation to Other Participants | Yes, #3 (8, 56, 33*) #5 (8) |
Yes, #4 (117) #5 (3 x 1, 22*) |
Yes, #1 (8, 56, 33) #5 (8) |
Yes, #2 (117) |
Yes, #1 (8). #2 (3 x 1, 22*) #3 (8) |
| Follow Up Effects |
Yes, Dream Quality Changed, Ongoing Effects |
Yes, Hyper-lucid Dream, Possible OBEs. Ongoing Effects |
Yes, Hypnagogic Review Process |
Yes, Emotional Catharsis Effects | Yes, OBE Afterwards |
| Table 1, Row 1 | Dream Sync Number: data directly from the oranur experimental numbers, or *, from the sum of those numbers. The key correlator number of each dataset is given. |
| Table 1, Row 4 | Precognitive Numbers: Unprompted numbers from the participants during the meditation. |
| Table 1, Row 7 | Correlation to Other Participants: data directly from the oranur experimental numbers (which cross-reference between participants) and *, correlation data through the dreams. |
| Datasets | Distribution |
|---|---|
| #1: 15, 30, 1, 18 = 64 | 1 = N = 11 |
| #2: 1, 1, 7, 1 = 10 | >1 and <10 = N = 2 |
| #3: 33, 21, 1, 1 = 56 | >10 and <20 = N = 3 |
| #4; 1, 104, 1, 11 = 117 | >20 and <100 = N = 3 |
| #5: 1, 1, 1, 5 = 8 | >100 = N = 1 |
| Total = 255 |
Second Run Conclusion
Run 2 was conducted in winter, 2025. Participants had a gender mirror with Run 1 which had 4 males and 1 female. Run 2 had 4 females and 1 male. There was a similar mix of ages and backgrounds with a similar average age (49 years in Run 2). The youngest and the oldest participants had the same ages in both runs (21 and 74).
There were also mirrors between the runs in terms of the actual number data. More later.
The prior rumble sound of the oranur device mirrored between runs. In both runs it rumbled before 4 out of 5 sessions.
Run 2 had some new effects with the rumble sound via the apparent precognitive timing (the rumble length and timing appeared precognitive).
Three participants had greatly changed dreaming, one had a possible small change, one didn’t recall her dreaming but had a significant hypnagogic episode during the evening.
In Run 2, unlike Run 1, the number to dream correlation was often via the number of dreams remembered (in Run 1 it was usually via the number of people in the dreams). In Run 2 there was also not nearly so much correlation between the individual datasets numerically. The main correlation appeared to be via the notion of a repeat 3-digit angel number. The overall sum in Run 2 (3255) signifies the key correlating method by its first digit, 3. The first two digits and the last three digits of the sum have other parallels, more later.
There was two people who were also in Run 1. They both showed a cumulative effect. The second session was much stronger. As in Run 1, some of the people felt they were physically prompted by the energy to awaken and record their dreams – 3 this time.
Some new aspects occurred in Run 2. Firstly, a new possible parameter of oranur was found. Surprisingly, low levels of oranur appear sensitive to ambient temperature. Mechanical effects become more active at 16 to 21°C approximately. Oranur appears to prefer conditions conducive to body temperature. It was already known that oranur prefers dry conditions. In the summer run the premises were unheated and it was relatively cool in the evenings. In the winter run the house was centrally warmed to 16 to 18°C. All heating was off during number collection and sleep periods.
Another new phenomenon in Run 2 was the apparent ability of OBEs and the dream state to hybridise. Twice a new crossover phenomenon occurred with elements from both. This is strange and unexpected.
The mode number in Run 2 was still the 1 but the incidence was lower (5 occurrences or 25%, down from about 50% in Run 1). The individual numbers themselves were highly significant in the tens and hundreds. This may be due to the more conducive ambient temperature in Run 2, despite it being winter. The number values between runs are not quantitatively comparable for this reason though the data is consistent within each run. The symbology of a number does not vary greatly with its numerical value so the symbolic comparison between runs is valid, for example 170, 1170 and 17 would all have similar energies. There were however still striking parallels between the numerical run data, especially the sums.
ChatGPT’s AI analysis of the Run 2 data indicated that it was non-random and had definite patterns at multiple levels. It noted the Run 1 and 2 data was differently organised. In Run 2 it found that there were patterns occurring by the type of number (small, medium and large). Also, that each individual dataset had one dominant number. However, it didn’t find patterns between individual datasets with the specific numbers as in Run 1 (for example, the 8 pattern). It noted that Run 1 and 2 had different energetic situations. It also intuited that Session #10 had different characteristics to the other Run 2 sessions, which was perceptive.
Tables 3 and 4 summarises the data obtained from the Run 2 participants.
| Participant | #6 | #7 | #8 | #9 | #10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dream Sync Number |
8* | 2 | 7 | 7 | 50 |
| Key Dream/Vision Symbol |
Teacher, Bee | Duality, Woman, Clock | Dogs, Restaurant |
Wolf, Spriit Fire |
Telescope, Meteor, Baby |
| Dream Correlation Method | Number of Dreams | Duality Principle | Number of Dreams | Number of Dreams | Number of People, Grief Principle |
| Question answered | Yes | Yes | Yes ++ | Yes | Yes ++ |
| Precognitive Number (Participant) | No | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Precognitive Aspect (Device) | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Prior Rumble Sound | Yes | No, (but post session rumble encoded key number) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Change in Dreaming | Yes ++ Cumulative Effect |
Possibly Slight | Yes ++ Cumulative Effect | Decreased Quantity, Same Recall/Lucidity | No Dream Recall but Striking Vision |
| Correlation to Other Participants | Angel Numbers | Angel Numbers | Angel Numbers* |
Angel Numbers | Angel Numbers# |
| Follow Up Effects |
Yes | No | Yes | Possible | Possible |
| Table 3, Row 1 | Dream Sync Number: data directly from the oranur experimental numbers or *, the sum of those numbers. The key correlator number is given. |
| Table 3, Row 9 | 3-digit ‘angel’ numbers within their experimental oranur numbers, or *, within the dreams, # indicates the angel numbers were within the numerology of the experimental numbers. |
| Datasets | Distribution |
|---|---|
| #6: 1, 21, 1, 3 = 26 | 1 = N = 5 |
| #7: 358, 127, 1, 226 = 712 | >1 and <10 = N = 2 |
| #8: 1, 24, 177, 50 = 252 | >10 and <20 = N = 0 |
| #9: 1, 1710, 110, 210 = 2,031 | >20 and <100 = N = 6 |
| #10: 89, 93, 50, 2 = 234 | >100 = N = 7 |
| Total = 3255 |
Overall Conclusion
Counting both runs there were 10 experimental sessions and 8 participants. That 2 participants took part twice was useful in assessing cumulative effects.
A new phenomenon of a dream-OBE hybrid was found in Run 2. Also Run 2 confirmed a new aspect of low levels of oranur (activity appears sensitive to ambient temperature).
There were many parallels between the sums of the data in the two runs. Run 1’s data sums to 255, mirroring Run 2 which summed to 3, 255. There were 2 runs each with 5 people, so 2, 5, 5. In Run 2, the oranur device appeared to be precognitive via the oranur rumble sound timing. The frequency of the rumble is 32 Hz, so 32, 55. Excluding itself, there are 15 positive factors of 3255 which references one of the key number themes in Run 1 – 15. If one includes all factors of 3255, it is 32 (counting both positive and negative numbers and the sum itself). This again reflects the oranur rumble sound of 32 Hz. If one adds the 3 + 2 from the 32(55) it is 5, 3 x the 5’s in the whole number is then 15, again a key from Run 1. One also gets 5, 5, 5 mirroring the angel number connecting principle of Run 2. Additionally, fifteen is an oranur number as it is the mirror of 51 or (19)51 when Reich discovered oranur.
It could be argued that the researcher fitted the numbers and dreams from subconscious associations of his own. That there are patterns throughout the Run 1 data, such as the number 8, 15, 117 and the significant outlier number argues against this. In Run 2 there was less numerical patterns within the data, but the numbers were statistically more significant individually, being mostly in the tens and hundreds (it is easier for lower numbers to be produced mechanically in the experiment). The dreams in Run 2 were differently connected to their key correlation number – most reflected a pattern via the number of recollected dreams (the amount of which was itself anomalous).
The position could be made that the energy merely makes the dreams stronger through increasing a metabolic process. However, some of the participants had greatly increased dreaming and some significantly decreased, in both runs. There was also the increase in paranormal activity which seemed to be centred on the numbers which came up in the closest session. This was partly why the experiment was emotionally intense for the researcher (as well as for some of the participants). Three participants were anxious about the sessions, but did it anyway, the rest looked forward to them. All got a lot out of the process. The researcher is very grateful for the huge effort they have all put in. Each person made a significant contribution of their time and energy.
Some 90% of participants had vivid dreams during the sessions, 100% had significant imagery episodes (one participant had an intense vision rather than a dream), 100% of the personal questions were answered in detail. Additionally, 100% of the dreams featured a key correlating number that had been given previously but was unknown at the time. The methods for correlation had a continuing aspect. They mostly used number of dream people in Run 1 and number of actual dreams in Run 2. Both runs also used symbolic correlations via objects or principles (anchor, snooker cue, games, duality, grief).
In Run 1 the participant who had no prior rumble had a precognition himself. In Run 2 the participant who had no prior rumble had an apparent ‘recognition’ from the device afterwards (the rumble at 2.22pm).
In summary:
a) There appears to be some kind of real energy interacting with the participant’s consciousness.
b) This energy field may affect dream intensity and recall.
c) The energy field may have some kind of conscious awareness and precognition evidenced by the crossover between the numbers supplied beforehand and their later appearing hidden within the dreams.
d) The energy may precipitate OBEs, OBE/dream hybrids and hyper-lucid dreams – both at the time and afterwards.
e) In Run 2 the oranur device demonstrated possible precognition in the timing of its rumble sound.
f) The device was perhaps ‘greeting’ the participants with its rumble (4 out of 5 participants in Run 1 and 2).
g) Two of the participants in Run 1 had premonitions of the oranur numbers. Participant #2 had two numerical sets and word premonitions as well. In Run 2 there was also 2 sets of premonitory numbers but based on their prior ‘lucky’ numbers.
h) All ten sets of dreams answered the questions posed in both runs. One would expect some of the dreams to answer the question but not all of them. A question in Run 2 was complex and all 3 aspects of it were answered (Session #10). Another question in Run 2 was simple but much additional, background information was given (Session #8). The deeper, hidden aspects of Participant #2’s question was intuited correctly.
i) There were at least 20 incidences of paranormal correlations during the experiment.
j) Every single participant had a significant visual episode, 90% had significant dreams with good recall.
k) Of the participants who dreamt, all had dreams which correlated with the experimental numbers.
l) There might be some level of shared consciousness occurring when more than one person is in the field for extended periods (particularly session #10).
m) Effects continue afterwards and can start beforehand.
At the end of the experiment, on the day of finishing writing the first part of the paper the researcher was in the large memorial garden nearby. Even this place appears to reflect the key numbers of the experiment. The buzzard was again seen, this time in a different area. It is an unusual place as it has three large sections, war sections and mass burial sections for poor Victorians. The buzzard had never been seen in the ‘non-conformist’ section before as it is the area nearest the main urban roads nearby.
It wasn’t far from three unusual items that encode key numbers from the experiment. There is a unique Egyptian monument which encodes the number 17 throughout (17 owls, 17 ankhs and so on). Near to this is a Christian stone which references Verse 17 from Psalm 139 – a Psalm which has special paranormal significance for the researcher (words from it appeared to him via a ‘voice’ in 2023). The nearby chapel also references the key oranur number of 8. The large cross there is made of octagonal lengths. The chapel tower has 8 sides at the top. There is also an eight-sided unusual tower at the Monroe Institute, which is the foremost place for the study of OBEs in the US. The Egyptian monument in the memorial gardens commemorates a pioneering Welsh astrologist who passed away on July 17th (17, 7). This connects to the experiment in three ways. Participant #10 was told her key mission was exploration of the cosmos visually, so telescopes, Participant #8 had a key number of 177 and 17 was a key number generally.
Twenty-six minutes after finishing writing up Part 2, the oranur device rumbled for the first time in 26 days. It continued for about 2 hours, the longest since the first continual rumble sound about a year ago (possibly 117 minutes in length though I was unable to confirm the end point exactly). Twenty-six was also one of the key numbers from Run 2 (the sum of Participant #6’s data). Some days after this the device rumbled for 17 minutes which was repeated a few days later, as if to underline the number. The researcher and Participant #2 were in the memorial gardens around this time. The buzzard appeared again, multiple times. It has never been seen in the afternoon before and for so long (it is usually seen very early when it is quietest and quite briefly). It was lightly raining so there were less people about.
Even the age of the participants connected. The two youngest participants in Run 1 had symbology connecting them – the 22-year age gap and snooker symbology. The eldest participants in both runs were the same and reflected a gematria for ‘ORGONE’ – 74. The youngest participant in both runs was the same, 21.
The researcher felt as though he was existing within a bubble of increased synchronicity during the whole experiment, often for days at a time. This reminded him of the scenes in the science fiction series. Foundation, where mathematical formulas are represented as holographic, interactive bubbles of liquid light energy. Increasing maths led to increasing consciousness effects in the series. This is exactly how it felt in the experiment, everything was connected, purposeful, even preordained.
On a more mundane level, it is unclear whether moon phase makes any difference in the effects, though it might. It does not appear that oranur has significant seasonal variation.
If consciousness creates patterns and orgone is conscious energy, one might expect synchronicity to increase with quantity and activity of orgone. Oranur is orgone in a state of increased energy and enhanced quantity. It appears that synchronicity did increase during the experiment as evidenced by the number connections to the dreams and the dream content. This was underlined by synchronicity regarding the numbers and dream symbols within the outside environment. It also appeared that direct communication may have occurred between the energy field, dream contents and environmental happenings. There was precognitive activity as well (both by persons and apparently, by the device).
There were some 14 numerical correlations between the individual Run 1 datasets and a single correlation principle in Run 2 (triple digit numbers). There were over 100 incidences of correlations and synchronicities altogether in both runs.
The experiment was a hybrid of quantitative and qualitative methods, psychological and physical research. It could be said therefore that although a single numerical significance value is naturally hard to place, that the experimental null hypothesis was nonetheless rejected (there is no evidence for increased synchronicity or direct communication).
There is therefore preliminary evidence that orgone may indeed possess consciousness.
REFERENCES
- Southgate, L (2026) Orgone and Consciousness Accounts, Orgoneandconsciousness.substack.com
- Southgate, L. (2021) Possible Environmental and Shamanic Effects of Oranur, Journal of Psychiatric Orgone Therapy,https://www.psychorgone.com/orgone-biophysics/possible-environmental-and-shamanic-effects-of-oranur
- Tart, C. (1967). Psychedelic Experiences Associated with a Novel Hypnotic Procedure, Mutual Hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, Vol 10, Num 2, pp65–78.
- Southgate, L. (2002) Traditional Chinese Medicine and Reichian Theory, Northern College of Acupuncture and University of Wales, MSc Thesis. See also: European Journal of Chinese Medicine, Vol 4, Num 4.












